METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE FORMATION OF MECHANISMS FOR IMPLEMENTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT VALUES BY ENTERPRISES

Keywords: sustainable development, corporate responsibility, methodological approaches, ESG, stakeholders, risk-oriented management, integrated management, circular economy

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to generalize and scientifically substantiate methodological approaches to the formation by enterprises of mechanisms for the implementation of sustainable development values within corporate governance systems, taking into account economic, social, and environmental determinants. Methodology. The study employs systemic, integrated, and stakeholder-based approaches, as well as methods of logical generalization, comparative analysis, structural–functional analysis, and conceptual modeling. The methodological framework is based on contemporary scientific concepts of sustainable development, corporate responsibility, risk-oriented management, and international sustainability standards. Results. It is established that the formation of mechanisms for implementing sustainable development values is the result of the evolution of scientific approaches, the transformation of regulatory guidelines, and the integration of international standards into corporate governance practice. It is proven that the methodological foundation of such mechanisms is based on the combination of systemic coherence, integration, scientific evidence, stakeholder engagement, and risk orientation. It is substantiated that the application of systemic and integrated approaches ensures the alignment of business processes with sustainability principles, while stakeholder-based and indicator-driven approaches enhance the soundness of managerial decision-making. It is determined that effective implementation of sustainable development values requires the use of preventive environmental methods, life cycle assessment, circular economy mechanisms, and adaptive and risk-oriented management tools. Practical significance. The practical value of the results lies in their applicability for enterprises in the formation and improvement of sustainable development mechanisms, the integration of ESG principles into corporate governance systems, the enhancement of strategic decision-making quality, and the обеспечение of long-term business resilience in a dynamic external environment.

References

Mauro P., Sahay R. Fiscal policy and growth in fragile and conflict-affected states. IMF Working Paper. 2020.

Brück T., Naudé W., Verwimp P. Business under fire: Entrepreneurship and violent conflict in developing countries. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2013. Vol.57(1). P. 3–19. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i23414181

Mazzucato M. The value of everything: Making and taking in the global economy. London: Penguin Books. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14267/RETP2020.03.20

Audretsch D., Momtaz P. P., Motuzenko H., Vismara S. The economic costs of the Russia–Ukraine war: A synthetic control study of (lost) entrepreneurship (preprint). 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.02773

Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business. 2012. URL: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1836336

Stiglitz J. E. Freefall: America, free markets, and the sinking of the world economy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.10628

World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. 1987. URL: https://www.brundtland.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Brundtland-Report-1987-Our-Common-Future.pdf

United Nations. Agenda 21. 1992. URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/170126

United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. URL: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 26000: Guidance on social responsibility. 2010. URL: https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html

Global Reporting Initiative. GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards. 2021. URL: https://www.globalreporting.org/standards

United Nations Global Compact. The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact. 2023. URL: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles

OECD. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. 2011. URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-guidelines-for-multinational-enterprises_9789264115415-en.html

United Nations Development Programme. SDG Indicators. 2020. URL: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/

European Commission. The European Green Deal. 2019. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

International Institute for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development Framework. 2023. URL: https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2023-05/ssi-review-standards-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs.pdf

European Parliament and Council. Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). 2022.

World Economic Forum. Global Risks Report. 2024. URL: https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2024/

European Commission. Mission-Oriented Research and Innovation. 2018. URL: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/eu-missions-horizon-europe/mission-oriented-policy-studies-and-reports_en

European Commission. Circular Economy Action Plan. 2020. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy

United Nations. Paris Agreement. 2015. URL: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf

Article views: 3
PDF Downloads: 2
Published
2026-01-30
How to Cite
Kniaz, O. (2026). METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE FORMATION OF MECHANISMS FOR IMPLEMENTING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT VALUES BY ENTERPRISES. Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Economics and Trade. A Series of “Economic Sciences”, (1 (119), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.37734/2409-6873-2026-1-4