WORLD TRENDS AND DOMESTIC EXPERIENCE IN THE USE OF PLANT AND ANIMAL PROTEIN SOURCES IN THE FORMATION OF MILITARY RATIONS: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Abstract
The diet of military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, who are in extreme conditions, needs to be improved in order to provide the military with macro– and microelements as completely as possible. A significant role is played by the protein component in Ready-to-Eat products. The purpose of the study: through information search, to determine the most accessible raw sources of protein of animal and plant origin in the form of concentrates, to conduct their analytical assessment, which will allow to scientifically substantiate the concept of creating a special-purpose protein-energy bar based on combined protein systems. Methods: A set of research methods was applied, including system, comparative, and monitoring analysis, generalization, and systematization of scientific publications in military nutrition, food chemistry, and specialized food technology. Regulatory documents (specifically, Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 426) and international experience in formulating individual combat rations in NATO armed forces (MRE, IMP, ORP programs) were analyzed. Results: Modern requirements for compact specialized Ready-to-Eat products and intermediate moisture foods for field rations were systematized. The technological advantages and constraints of utilizing dairy isolates (whey protein, micellar casein) and plant concentrates were evaluated. It was demonstrated that forming a composite protein matrix based on animal protein hydrolysate/isolate and plant protein concentrates (specifically, domestic sunflower and pea concentrates) yields a pronounced synergistic effect. This approach allows optimizing the amino acid profile (evaluated by DIAAS), increasing biological value, and preventing undesirable rheological and structural degradation (hardening and fat phase separation) during long-term storage across temperatures from -20 to +40 °C for at least 24 months. The utilization of domestic plant raw materials creates prerequisites for significant production cost reduction and import substitution, making this direction essential for the security and defense sector food supply. Conclusions: A theoretical background was established for the subsequent experimental phase involving formulation modeling of a special-purpose protein-energy bar, determination of its rheological, structuralmechanical, microbiological, and organoleptic characteristics, and assessment of lipid and protein complex stability during accelerated aging and extended storage.
References
2. Чорна В. В., Крупка Н. О., Лотоцька-Дудик У. Б. Сучасні вимоги до нутрієнтного складу харчування та стану продовольчого забезпечення військовослужбовців Збройних Сил України. Вісник Вінницького національного медичного університету. 2023. Т. 27, № 2. С. 313-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31393/reportsvnmedical-2023-27(2)-23
3. Маслійчук О. Б., Сімахіна Г. О., Науменко Н. В. Наукові засади розроблення продуктів з підвищеним вмістом білка в раціоні харчування військовослужбовців. Таврійський науковий вісник. Серія: Технічні науки. 2023. № 5. С. 120-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/tnv-tech.2023.6.14.
4. Про норми харчування військовослужбовців Збройних Сил, інших військових формувань та Державної служби спеціального зв'язку та захисту інформації, поліцейських, осіб рядового, начальницького складу органів і підрозділів цивільного захисту : Постанова Кабінету Міністрів України від 29 берез. 2002 р. № 426. Дата оновлення: 28.02.2026. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/426-2002-%D0%BF (дата звернення: 03.07.2026).
5. Vidal V. A. S., Jensen I.-J., Sandbakk Ø., Haugnes P., Austeen M. W., Gjeldnes R., Svihus B., Lerfall J. Military rations: Nutritional, sensorial and technological quality and their effects on military physical exercise in extreme environments. Nutrition Research Reviews. 2025. Vol. 38, iss. 1. P. 324-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422424000246
6. McLellan T. Protein Supplementation for Military Personnel: A Review of the Mechanisms and Performance Outcomes. The Journal of Nutrition. 2013. Vol. 143, iss. 11. P. 1820S-1833S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.113.176313.
7. Гуліч М. П., Депутат Ю. М., Любарська Л. С. Харчування військовослужбовців Збройних Сил України в умовах проведення Операції об’єднаних сил: проблеми та порівняльна оцінка індивідуальних харчових пайків. Український журнал військової медицини. 2019. Т. 19, № 1. С. 46-51. URL: https://ujmm.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/148.
8. Anderson R. E. 3rd, Casperson S. L., Kho H., Flack K. D. The Role of Dietary Protein in Body Weight Regulation among Active-Duty Military Personnel during Energy Deficit: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2023. Vol. 15, iss. 18. Art. 3948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15183948.
9. Banach J. C., Clark S., Lamsal B. P. Texture and other changes during storage in model high-protein nutrition bars formulated with modified milk protein concentrates. LWT – Food Science and Technology. 2014. Vol. 56, iss. 1. P. 77-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.11.008
10. Loveday S. M., Hindmarsh J. P., Creamer L. K., Singh H. Physicochemical changes in a model protein bar during storage. Food Research International. 2009. Vol. 42, № 7. P. 798-806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.002
11. Leser S. FAO dietary protein report. Nutrition Bulletin. 2013. Vol. 38, iss. 4. P. 421-428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12063.
12. Mathai J. K., Liu Y., Stein H. H. Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibilitycorrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS). The British Journal of Nutrition. 2017. Vol. 117, iss. 4. P. 490-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517000125
13. Day L. Proteins from land plants – Potential resources for human nutrition and food security. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2013. Vol. 32, iss. 1. P. 25-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2013.05.005.
14. Kyriakopoulou K., Dekkers B., van der Goot A. J. Plant-Based Meat Analogues. Sustainable Meat Production and Processing / ed. C. M. Galanakis. Academic Press, 2019. Chap. 6. P. 103-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814874-7.00006-7.
15. González-Pérez S., Vereijken J. M. Sunflower proteins: overview of their physicochemical, structural and functional properties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2007. Vol. 87, iss. 12. P. 2173-2191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2971.
16. Sha L., Xiong Y. L. Plant protein-based alternatives of reconstructed meat: Science, technology, and challenges. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2020. Vol. 102. P. 51-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.022
17. Dietrich R. B., Lincoln L., Momen S., Minkoff B. B., Sussman M. R., Girard A. L. Role of protein and lipid oxidation in hardening of high-protein bars during storage. Journal of Food Science. 2025. Vol. 90, iss. 1. Art. e17663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.17663

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
