DETERMINISM OF DYNAMICS AND DIRECTION OF INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL-URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS OF UKRAINE

  • Iryna Pavlova Odesa National Technological University
Keywords: sectoral orientation of inclusive development, determinism of dynamics and of orientation of inclusive development, united territorial communities, districts, rural and urban orientation of inclusive development, rural-urban agglomerations, Ukraine

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to substantiate the determinism of dynamics, sectoral and socio-spatial orientation of the inclusive development of UTC and districts as rural-urban agglomerations. To achieve it, the task of defining the essence of the inclusive development of rural-urban agglomerations and its gradual deployment was formulated; characteristics of factors determining the dynamics and direction of inclusive development of rural-urban agglomerations; revealing the peculiarities of the manifestation of the determinism of the dynamics and orientation of inclusive development in certain types of these agglomeration formations. Methodology of research. In the process of research, the principle of interdisciplinarity was used to understand the essence of the reform of the territorial organization of society, systematic and synergistic approachs in identifying the relationship between the decentralization of public power and management in a community format, in the consolidation of districts and the creation of prerequisites for the formation of a common rural-urban inclusive environment, statistical and comparative methods, methods of analysis and synthesis regarding comparison of agrarian and industrial directions of development and of socio-spatial orientation of inclusive development of UTC and districts. Findings. Defined the essence and phasing of the deployment of the inclusive development of rural-urban agglomerations as a social process, which begins with involvement (the formation of UTC and of new districts, «mixed» in terms of the composition of settlements and their inhabitants), is continues with the overcoming of the second stage ‒ inclusivity (dynamic functioning within a single the space of communities and districts) and ends with the third stage ‒ of integration (combining joint efforts of rural and urban UTC and districts) with the aim of creating an environment of inclusion. It has been proven that, in view of their natural resource potential and population composition, rural UTCs have an inherent agrarian or agro-industrial sectoral and rural socio-spatial orientation of inclusive development. Urban and, to some extent, large township UTCs, having in their composition villages and the rural population are rural-urban agglomerations of rural-urban socio-spatial orientation and of sectoral agrarian, agro-industrial, industrial, service orientation of inclusive development. All districts are «mixed» in terms of the composition of communities, settlements and population, therefore they are distinguished by the appropriate sectoral and socio-spatial orientation of inclusive development. Nominally more likely to achieve full inclusion by overcoming all three stages of inclusive development are UTCs and districts whose administrative centers are large cities and, above all, regional centers. Practical value. The practical use of the proposed scientific provisions and recommendations of an applied nature will contribute to the post-war reconstruction and further development of rural-urban agglomerations on the basis of inclusiveness.

References

Luca D., Terrero-Davila J., Stein J., Neil Lee N. Progressive Cities: Urban-rural polarisation of social values and economic development around the world, 2022. URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/113458/1/III_WPS_progressive_cities_paper_74.pdf (дата звернення: 15.11.2022).

Zuzańska-Żyśko E. and Dyszy M. Dynamic Villages in the Hinterland of a Polycentric Region: Case Study of the Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowska Metropolis in Poland. 2021, Land. 10 (8). URL: https://www-mdpi-com.translate.goog/2073-445X/10/8/779?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=uk&_x_tr_hl=uk&_x_tr_pto=sc (дата звернення: 12.11.2022).

Bren d’Amour C., Reitsma F., Baiocchi G. and Seto K. C. Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606036114 (дата звернення: 13.11.2022).

Урбаністична Україна: в епіцентрі просторових змін : монографія; за ред. К. Мезенцева, Я. Олійника, Н. Мезенцевої. Київ : Видавництво «Фенікс», 2017. 438 с.

Khumarova N. I., Tiutiunnyk H. O. Methodological basis of inclusiveness of natural resources management in the context of agricultural land use. Економічні інновації. 2019. Том 21, випуск 3 (72). С. 171‒181.

Захарчук О. До найкращого балансу або Як забезпечити успішний інклюзивний розвиток агросектору та сільських територій. 23 червня 2022. URL:https://agrotimes.ua/article/do-najkrashhogo-balansu/ (дата звернення: 14.11.2022).

Бородіна О. М., Прокопа І. В. Інклюзивний сільський розвиток: науковий дискурс. Економіка і прогнозування. 2019, № 1. С. 70‒85.

Павлов О. І., Дідух С. М., Барвіненко В. Д. Агропродовольчі холдинги в системі інклюзивного сільського розвитку. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Серія: Економіка і менеджмент. 2020. Випуск 45. С. 49‒55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32841/2413-2675/2020-45-8

Павлов О., Дідух С., Барвіненко В. Роль агрохолдингів в інклюзивному розвитку об’єднаних територіальних громад та районів: синергетичний ефект децентралізації. Регіональна економіка. 2020. № 4. С. 32–42.

Krugman P. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991. 476 p.

Вісім громад на Одещині визнали неефективними в умовах війни, серед них ‒ Яськівська ОТГ. 07 вересня 2022 року. URL: https://bilyayivka.city/articles/235364/visim-gromad-na-odeschini-viznali-neefektivnimi-v-umovah-vijni-sered-nih-yaskivska-otg (дата звернення: 08.10. 2022).

From urban-rural linkages to urban-rural relationships in the EU. February 13, 2014. URL: https://epthinktank-eu.translate.goog/2014/02/13/from-urban-rural-linkages-to-urban-rural-relationships-in-the-eu/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=uk&_x_tr_hl=uk&_x_tr_pto=sc (дата звернення: 19.11.2022).

Luca D., Terrero-Davila J., Stein J., Neil Lee N. (2022). Progressive Cities: Urban-rural polarisation of social values and economic development around the world. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/113458/1/III_WPS_progressive_cities_paper_74.pdf (accessed 15 November 2022).

Zuzańska-Żyśko E. and Dyszy M. (2021). Dynamic Villages in the Hinterland of a Polycentric Region: Case Study of the Górnośląsko-Zagłębiowska Metropolis in Poland. Land. 10 (8). Retrieved from: https://www-mdpi-com.translate.goog/2073-445X/10/8/779?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=uk&_x_tr_hl=uk&_x_tr_pto=sc (accessed 12 November 2022).

Bren d’Amour C., Reitsma F., Baiocchi G. And Seto K. C. (2016). Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606036114 (accessed 13 November 2022).

K. Mezentseva, Ya. Oliinyka, N. Mezentsevoi (Eds.). (2017). Urbanistychna Ukraina: v epitsentri prostorovykh zmin [Urbanistic Ukraine: at the epicenter of spatial changes]. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo «Feniks». [in Ukrainian]

Khumarova N.I., Tiutiunnyk H.O. (2019). Methodological basis of inclusiveness of natural resources management in the context of agricultural land use. Ekonomichni innovatsii – Economic innovations, 21, Vols. 3 (72), pp. 171‒181.

Zakharchuk O. (2022). Do naikrashchoho balansu abo Yak zabezpechyty uspishnyi inkliuzyvnyi rozvytok ahrosektoru ta silskykh terytorii [Towards the best balance or How to ensure successful inclusive development of the agricultural sector and rural areas]. Available at: https://agrotimes.ua/article/do-najkrashhogo-balansu/ (accessed 14 November 2022) [in Ukrainian].

Borodina O.M., Prokopa I.V. (2019). Inkliuzyvnyi silskyi rozvytok: naukovyi dyskurs [Inclusive rural development: scientific discourse]. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia – Economics and forecasting, 1, 70‒85. [in Ukrainian]

Pavlov O.I. Didukh S.M. Barvinenko V.D. (2020). Ahroprodovolchi kholdynhy v systemi inkliuzyvnoho silskoho rozvytku [Agri-food holdings in the system of inclusive rural development]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika i menedzhment – Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Economics and management, 45, 49‒55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32841/2413-2675/2020-45-8 [in Ukrainian]

Pavlov O., Didukh S., Barvinenko V. (2020). Rol ahrokholdynhiv v inkliuzyvnomu rozvytku obiednanykh terytorialnykh hromad ta raioniv: synerhetychnyi efekt detsentralizatsii [The role of agricultural holdings in the inclusive development of united territorial communities and districts: the synergistic effect of decentralization] Rehionalna ekonomika – Regional economy, 4, 32–42. [in Ukrainian]

Krugman P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 476 p.

Visim hromad na Odeshchyni vyznaly neefektyvnymy v umovakh viiny, sered nykh ‒ Yaskivska OTH [Eight communities in Odesa region were recognized as ineffective in war conditions, among them ‒ Yaskiv OTG]. Available at: https://bilyayivka.city/articles/235364/visim-gromad-na-odeschini-viznali-neefektivnimi-v-umovah-vijni-sered-nih-yaskivska-otg (accessed 08 October 2022) [in Ukrainian].

From urban-rural linkages to urban-rural relationships in the EU. February 13, 2014. Available at: https://epthinktank-eu.translate.goog/2014/02/13/from-urban-rural-linkages-to-urban-rural-relationships-in-the-eu/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=uk&_x_tr_hl=uk&_x_tr_pto=sc (accessed 19 November 2022).

Article views: 76
PDF Downloads: 83
Published
2022-12-29
How to Cite
Pavlova, I. (2022). DETERMINISM OF DYNAMICS AND DIRECTION OF INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL-URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS OF UKRAINE . Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Economics and Trade. A Series of “Economic Sciences”, (2 (106), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.37734/2409-6873-2022-2-7