AKING INTO ACCOUNT FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN THE RECOVERY OF EUROPEAN ECONOMIES

Keywords: post-war recovery, economic strategy, international assistance, European integration, European experience, state regulation, Marshall Plan

Abstract

The article discusses the important topic of recovery of European economies after military conflicts, which is particularly relevant in light of the current challenges faced by Ukraine on the path to post-war recovery. The purpose of the study is to analyze the economic recovery strategies of Germany, France, Italy, and Eastern European countries that experienced significant destruction as a result of World War II. This analysis is crucial as it provides insights into the mechanisms that facilitated recovery in these nations, which can be valuable for Ukraine as it navigates its own complex recovery process. The methodology of the research includes a comprehensive discussion of various models of economic policy applied in these countries, as well as mechanisms of international financial support, particularly the impact of the Marshall Plan on economic recovery. This historical context is essential for understanding how targeted financial assistance and strategic policy implementation can lead to successful recovery outcomes. The study also examines the role of government regulation in the recovery process, emphasizing its critical importance in shaping economic resilience and stability. The results highlight the key factors that contributed to the rapid economic recovery of European countries, including the effectiveness of public administration, attracting international investment, supporting small and medium-sized businesses, developing infrastructure, and ensuring social protection. These factors are interconnected and demonstrate that a multifaceted approach is necessary for effective recovery. For instance, strong public administration creates an environment conducive to investment, while robust infrastructure supports business operations and social protection measures ensure that vulnerable populations are not left behind. The practical significance of the research results lies in the need to adapt successful practices of foreign experience to the current conditions of Ukraine, which requires a comprehensive approach to recovery from military operations. This adaptation involves not only learning from past successes but also recognizing the unique challenges that Ukraine faces today. By taking into account lessons from the past, Ukraine can avoid potential mistakes and leverage available opportunities for recovery, thus paving the way for sustainable development and economic stability in the post-conflict landscape. In conclusion, the article emphasizes that the recovery of European economies after military conflicts can serve as a valuable source of knowledge and practices for Ukraine. The insights gained from this comparative analysis are essential for developing a robust recovery strategy that addresses both immediate needs and long-term goals, ultimately contributing to the resilience and prosperity of the nation in the years to come.

References

Aho Esko. (2001). Finland's Way to a Knowledge-Based Economy. Research Policy, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1331–1346.

Baker A. (2011). The Impact of Fiscal Stimulus on the UK Economy. National Institute Economic Review, vol. 215, pp. 13–23.

Baker C. (1993) The Nationalization of British Industry: A Historical Perspective. Business History Review, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 643–670.

Balcerowicz Leszek. (1994). Socialism, Capitalism, Transformation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 55-68.

Benedict C. (2021) The economic impact of COVID-19 and the eu's nextgenerationeu recovery plan. European economic review. P. 1–25.

Benedict C. (2021) The economic impact of COVID-19 and the eu's nextgenerationeu recovery plan. European economic review. P. 1–25.

Bennett Andrew, and Michael J. Bailey. (1995) Privatization in Poland: The Role of the State. Comparative Politics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 299–318.

Blanchard O. Summers L. (2019) Hysteresis and the european unemployment problem. Economic policy. Vol. 34, no. 100. P. 5–34.

Böheim René, and Peter Huber. (1998) The German Banking System: A Historical Perspective. Journal of Economic History, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–28.

Boyer Robert. (1996) The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. New Political Economy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27–48.

Brousseau Eric. (2000) Financial Liberalization and Economic Growth in France. The European Journal of Finance, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 123–145.

Cohen Daniel. (1998) The French Economy: A New Model. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 3–22.

Eichengreen Barry. (2007) The European Economy Since 1945: Coordinated Capitalism and Beyond. Princeton University Press.

European Central Bank. (2020) Monetary policy in the time of COVID-19. ECB economic bulletin. No. 5. 1–20.

Feldstein Martin. (1995) The Marshall Plan and the European Recovery. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137–152.

Fischer Stanley. (1994) The Economic Consequences of German Unification. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 1994, no. 1, pp. 1–66.

Gellman M. (2012) The Marshall plan: a strategy for economic recovery. Economic history review. Vol. 65, no. 2. P. 453–478.

Gellman M. (2012) The Marshall plan: a strategy for economic recovery. Economic history review. Vol. 65, no. 2. P. 453–478.

Gieve John. (2008) The Role of the Bank of England in the Financial Crisis. Financial Stability Review, vol. 12, pp. 1–10.

Gourevitch Peter. (1977) Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Crises. Comparative Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–29.

Grassi Angelo. (2018) The Economic Impact of the Marshall Plan on Western Europe. European Economic Review, vol. 92, pp. 1–12.

Grassi Angelo. (2018) The Marshall Plan: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Economic History, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 789–812.

Harrison B. (1996) The Impact of the National Health Service on British Society. Social History of Medicine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 215–234.

Harrison Mark. (1999) The Marshall Plan: Design, Accomplishments, and Significance. European Review of Economic History, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 159–178.

International Monetary Fund. (2022) The Next Generation EU: A New Instrument for Recovery. IMF policy paper. P. 1–30.

Kallio Jari. (2000) Banking Reforms in Finland: The Role of the Government. European Journal of Finance, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 229–245.

Kauppinen Ilkka. (2009) The Finnish Banking Crisis of the 1990s: Causes and Consequences. Banking and Finance Review, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–22.

King Mervyn. (2009) The Monetary Policy Response to the Financial Crisis. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 207–218.

Klaus R. (2013) The european stability mechanism: a new era for financial stability in europe. Journal of european integration. Vol. 35, no. 3. P. 123–140.

Klaus R. (2013) The european stability mechanism: a new era for financial stability in europe. Journal of european integration. Vol. 35, no. 3. P. 123–140.

Kowalik Tadeusz. (2000) The Polish Economy: A Historical Perspective. Post-Communist Economies, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 479–494.

Mason T. (1993) The Marshall Plan: A Strategy for Recovery. The Historical Journal, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 661–683.

Monnet Jean. (1976) Mémoires. Paris: Fayard.

Piketty Thomas. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.

Schroeder K. (2021) Comparative analysis of economic recovery strategies in the EU: lessons learned. European economic review. Vol. 135. P. 1–20.

Suominen Kati. (2001) Nokia and the Finnish IT Revolution. Telecommunications Policy, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 633–646.

Article views: 10
PDF Downloads: 6
Published
2025-04-30
How to Cite
Zakrevskyi, Y. (2025). AKING INTO ACCOUNT FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN THE RECOVERY OF EUROPEAN ECONOMIES. Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Economics and Trade. A Series of “Economic Sciences”, (2 (116), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.37734/2409-6873-2025-2-3