EFFECTIVE BUSINESS MODELS OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A MACROECONOMIC VIEW
Abstract
The article examines the research of typical business models used by successful global social enterprises in order to develop recommendations for improving the sustainability of domestic companies of the appropriate orientation. It is stated that the question remains relevant about how exactly in the course of the implementation of social entrepreneurship, the combination of social and economic values is implemented, and especially what role the formation of a special social network and the implementation of a resource provision strategy play in this. For the purpose of the study, several "classic" cases from different countries with diverse social and economic environments were selected to formulate common features of their business models. A macroeconomic analysis of the companies identified for the study was carried out, namely: the socio-economic basis of their activities was studied and a component analysis of the corresponding business models was carried out. It is noted that in the case of the conducted research, the business model is a business concept that forms the basis of practice. Among the main components of the relevant business models are: Value network (controlled positions or zones of predominant influence within the value Network); Strategic Resources (needs for Strategic Resources included in the business model); consumer interface (integration of Target groups). It is proved that the studied examples of successful social entrepreneurship differ significantly from each other in terms of social mission, organizational structure, as well as the economic and social environment in which they originated, but at the same time, there is a significant kinship between them. It is argued that all of them produce a social good: for Grameen, it is the elimination of poverty by rural women in Bangladesh; for Секем, it is the cultivation of natural products without the use of chemical fertilizers, as well as the promotion of cultural and social life in Egypt; for ICC, it is the creation of jobs and economic development opportunities for people who previously did not have them. It is proved that these companies owe their success to a special combination of social and economic efficiency. It is determined that the activities of all three companies are based on the division of common values of the "community", which were used for creating a supporting social network (value network); acquiring strategic resources; managing interaction with consumers ("consumer interface"). It is concluded that since the key difference between social entrepreneurship is the creation of social value, which within the business model will be primary and will determine the strategic goal of the business, it can be said that social value can be created in any of the components of the business model, and the creation of social value, according to the analysis of empirical examples, usually requires specific changes in at least two blocks of the corresponding model.
References
Abdou E., El Ebrashi R. The Social Enterprise Sector in Egypt: Current Status and Way Forward. Social Entrepreneurship in the Middle East. 2015, pp. 37–62.
Akhmedova A., Mas-Machuca M., Magomedova N. Nexus between strategic fit and social mission accomplishment in social enterprises: Does organizational form matter? Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 330. January 2021, pp. 26–39.
Alter S. K. Social entrepreneurship: new models of sustainable social change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006, 232 p.
Baumol W. J. Секем: A Remarkable Tale of Social Entrepreneurship with Critical Lessons for Policy. Innovations. Summer 2008, pp. 49–55.
Bibby A. Co-operatives in Spain – Mondragon leads the way. Guardian sustainable business. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/social-enterprise-network/2012/mar/12/cooperatives-spain-mondragon
Clamp C. A., Alhamis I. Social Entrepreneurship in the Mondragon Co-operative Corporation and the Challenges of Successful Replication. The Journal of Entrepreneurship. Vol. 19 issue: 2, pp. 149–177.
Examples social entrepreneurs – Ideas for social entrepreneurs. Available at: https://www.oneday.at/2021/07/12/social-entrepreneurship-crash-course/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI9raQ2uXl9gIV30CRBR3vMQPEEAAYAyAAEgJ4LPD_BwE
Hyeock I., Sung L., Kima M., Greenb S. Social enterprises and market performance: The moderating roles of innovativeness, sectoral alignment, and geographic localization. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 132. August 2021, pp. 491–506.
Indian Economy Compendium for IAS Prelims General Studies. Disha Publications. 2020. 402 p.
Goienetxea J. A mondragon corporation’s perspective. Available at: https://www.aciamericas.coop/IMG/pdf/3.2_javier_goienetxea_en_con_firma_en.pdf
Levenson G. The Bold Vision of Grameen Bank's Muhammad Yunus. Available at: https://hbr.org/2010/05/the-bold-vision-of-grameen-banks-muhammad-yunus
Mondragon Corporation. Available at: https://www.mondragon-corporation.com/en/about-us/
Nurhayati N. Grameen Bank Proyek “Social Business” Muhammad Yunus. JBMP (Journal Bisnis Manajemen dan Perbankan). Vol. 2(1):31 March 2016, pp. 162–171.
Picciotti A. Towards sustainability: the innovation paths of social enterprise. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/apce.12168
Shin H. Social Entrepreneur Muhammad Yunus and Grameen Bank. Available at: https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/social-innovation/0/steps/86961
Social Entrepreneurship – СЕКЕМ. Available at: https://www.Секем.com/en/tag/social-entrepreneurship/
Social Entrepreneur Helmy Abouleish. Available at: https://www.schwabfound.org/awardees/helmy-abouleish
Steiner A., Teasdale S. Unlocking the potential of rural social enterprise. Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 70. August 2019, pp. 144–154.
Ubels H., Haartsen T., Bock B. Social innovation and community-focused civic initiatives in the context of rural depopulation. Journal of Rural Studies. Vol. 68. March 2019, pp. 121–133.
Vasquez-Delsolar M., Merino A. Social enterprises towards a sustainable business system: A model of institutional dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. Vol. 40. September 2021, pp. 663–679.