GOVERNMENT POLICY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION AS A TOOL TO STIMULATE INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY

  • Nataliia Pedchenko Poltava University of Economics and Trade
  • Liudmyla Franko Poltava University of Economics and Trade
Keywords: intellectual property, intellectual property protection, state support, innovation policy, innovation, innovative development of the national economy

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to study the government policy of intellectual property protection as a tool to stimulate the innovative development of the national economy. Research methodology. The achievement of the purpose set in the article is carried out with the help of comparative analysis of the level of intellectual property protection of Ukraine and foreign countries; a retrospective analysis of the Intellectual Property Index of Ukraine. Findings. The article describes the meaning and the main characteristics of the concepts of "intellectual property", "intellectual property rights" and "state policy for the protection of intellectual property". The main tools for the protection of intellectual property are defined: patents, trademarks, trade secrets, author’s law and related rights. The research of modern trends in the protection of intellectual property in the world economy is carried out. Based on the analysis of Ukraine's place in the IP index (research by The U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Global Innovation Policy Center) and the IPRI index (Property Rights Alliance research), key gaps in state support for intellectual property protection in Ukraine were identified. Practical value. The results of clustering of the countries across the world according to IP and IPRI indices allowed to outline alternative options for improving the effectiveness of state support for Ukraine in the direction of harmonization of national legislation and procedures for the protection of intellectual property. The need for government support has been determined areas: for the provision of legal and technical assistance to owners of intellectual property rights; creating a favorable environment for the transfer of technologies in the host states; facilitating the resolution of private disputes regarding intellectual property; the development of information technologies for the storage, access and use of valuable information about intellectual property; regulation of effective mechanisms of public administration of the process of implementation of inventions; adoption the European experience in stimulating small and medium-sized enterprises that are innovators The proposed measures will help strengthen government support for the protection of intellectual property in Ukraine, improving the ability of innovators and inventors to protect their innovations.

References

Груба Г. І. Тенденції захисту інтелектуальної власності в Україні. Економіка та держава. 2011. № 8. С. 88–90.

Законодавство України. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/

Олефір А. Правове регулювання інтелектуальної власності й інноваційних відносин в угоді про асоціацію України та ЄС. Теорія і практика інтелектуальної власності. 2014. № 5. С. 79–94.

Паладій М. Інфраструктура системи державного управління сферою інтелектуальної власності: підхід до удосконалення. Науковий вісник «Демократичне врядування». 2011. № 7. URL: http://www.lvivacademy.com/vidavnitstvo_1/visnik7/fail/paladij.pdf

Педченко Н. С., Стрілець В. Ю., Франко Л. С. Макроконкурентна парадигма інноваційного розвитку національної економіки. Наукові перспективи. 2022. № 1(19). С. 351–360.

Юринець З. В. Інноваційні стратегії в системі підвищення конкурентоспроможності економіки України : дис... докт. екон. наук : 08.00.03 / Львівський національний університет імені І. Франка. Львів, 2016. 519 с.

International IP index. Recovery through ingenuity. 2021. URL: https://www.theglobalipcenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/GIPC_IPIndex2021_FullReport_v3.pdf

International Property Rights Index 2021. URL: https://www.internationalpropertyrightsindex.org/

Nemlioglu I. A Comparative Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights: A case of Developed versus Developing Countries. Procedia Computer Science. 2019. № 158. P. 988–998.

Hruba H. I. (2011) Tendentsii zakhystu intelektualnoi vlasnosti v Ukraini [Trends in the protection of intellectual property in Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta derzhava - Economy and state, 8, 88–90.

Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy [Legislation of Ukraine]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/

Olefir A. (2014) Pravove rehuliuvannia intelektualnoi vlasnosti y innovatsiinykh vidnosyn v uhodi pro asotsiatsiiu Ukrainy ta YeS [Legal regulation of intellectual property and innovation relations in the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU]. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti – Theory and practice of intellectual property, 5, 79–94.

Paladii M. (2011) Infrastruktura systemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia sferoiu intelektualnoi vlasnosti: pidkhid do udoskonalennia [Theory and practice of intellectual property]. Naukovyi visnyk «Demokratychne vriaduvannia» – Scientific Bulletin "Democratic Governance". № 7. Available at: http://www.lvivacademy.com/vidavnitstvo_1/visnik7/fail/paladij.pdf

Pedchenko N. S., Strilets V. Yu., Franko L. S. (2022) Makrokonkurentna paradyhma innovatsiinoho rozvytku natsionalnoi ekonomiky [Macrocompetitive paradigm of innovative development of the national economy.]. Naukovi perspektyvy – Scientific perspectives, 1(19), 351–360.

Iurynets Z. V. (2016) Innovatsiini stratehii v systemi pidvyshchennia konkurentospromozhnosti ekonomiky Ukrainy [Innovative strategies in the system of increasing the competitiveness of the economy of Ukraine], Lviv, 519. [in Ukrainian]

International IP index. Recovery through ingenuity. 2021. Available at: https://www.theglobalipcenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/GIPC_IPIndex2021_FullReport_v3.pdf

International Property Rights Index 2021. Available at: https://www.internationalpropertyrightsindex.org/

Nemlioglu I. (2019) A Comparative Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights: A case of Developed versus Developing Countries. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 988–998.

Article views: 134
PDF Downloads: 84
Published
2022-07-01
How to Cite
Pedchenko, N., & Franko, L. (2022). GOVERNMENT POLICY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION AS A TOOL TO STIMULATE INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY. Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Economics and Trade. A Series of “Economic Sciences”, (1 (105), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.37734/2409-6873-2022-1-14